事业的成功，看看这条信息吧，别再说了，莫再等了，赢在职称资讯快人一步上。
欧洲大学博士论文评审和rand paper rejoin 趣谈 selection
In recent years has a review from Australia, Singapore, South Korea, India and Europe more than ten doctoral dissertations, and participated in some of the paper's plea, which also have a lot of fun.
Tell you what to Germany this year the university of Dortmund a doctoral dissertations review and of the thesis. Ph.D. Thesis mainly by a doctoral candidate at reading during a paper published composition, front plus a paper content abstract, behind added a prospect. Review the paper's contribution to evaluate and give score. In addition to me outside, rejoin committee also by a professor (at defense committee chairman), doctoral supervisor and a young man, like the doctoral student representative. Defense, the candidate's wife, more than 10 years old children and both parents attended, wearing very formal. When defense by four members took turns in asking questions, lasted for about two hours. After a busy defense as usual.
Technical university of Denmark paper review and rejoin the slightly different. Review process to the university by a professor coordination, review of this paper first amendment opinions that the revised if three men agreed to review, can undertake thesis reply. Defense points of two parts, the first by the three judges turns to the question, and have a secretary record. The second phase is free from the audience questions.
The most interesting or the university of Amsterdam doctoral thesis defense. But the chairman rejoin committee by the university professor as an outside, main members from abroad. In addition, members with full professor title must wear coats of dr. Similar clothing, reply before each agreed asking, general two. President also especially reminds, when the questions to stand up, and to "respect of candidate" to begin with. Defense began, by a female MC and the closing of leading, then the defense committee chairman and other member, everybody crowd cheered as. Now wait for the defense of the meeting room all stand up, until rejoin committee members in the designated position on the table. MC stand in the middle, announced that defense began. Defense after about one hour and a half, emcee the bell ring announced that defense over. Later, and in MC, led rejoin committee members and filed out.
Finally a British doctoral thesis reviews and paper rejoin (viva), generally by the school and finally two review (and rejoin committee members) composition. When reply some schools still has an independent chairman. Review report points independent report and joint report two parts, independent report from the defense review people before their respective, joint report by two after the defense review people finish together. Such as the defense Birmingham university has a chairman is present, but in the process of defense can't say anything, except in dispute. York university, to rejoin the whole process recording. Where I am computer department at the university of surrey, had created a President, but has now removed. But if a doctoral candidate clear requirements, the tutor can present. But in the process of defense can't speak, unless invited. When defense two review one can doctoral on any details of questions, general will last three hours or so.
In short, the European university Ph.D thesis reviews and defense of this paper is the control of quality, also reflected the fair and a spirit of mutual respect.
比来几年先后评审了来自澳大利亚，新加坡，韩国，印度和欧洲的十多篇博士论文，并列入了其中部门论文的答辩，其中也有不少趣事。
先说一下今年给德国多特蒙德大学的一篇博士论文评审及论文答辩。博士论文首要由博士候选人在读博时代揭橥的论文组成，前面加上一篇论文内容简介，后背添上一篇瞻望。评审需对论文的进献作出评价并给出评分。除了我外，答辩委员会还由一位教授（任答辩委员会主席），博士生导师和一个年青人，似乎是代表博士生的。答辩时，候选人的太太，十多岁的孩子及双方怙恃都列入了，穿戴很正式。答辩时由四位成员轮流提问，历时约两个小时。答辩后按例热闹一番。
丹麦手艺大学的论文评审和答辩略有分歧。评审过程由该大学的一位教授协调，评审人先对论文提出改削定见，改削后若三位评审人赞成，就可以进行论文答辩。答辩分两部份，先由三位评审人轮流提问，并有一个秘书纪录。第二阶段才由听众自由提问。
最有趣的照样阿姆斯特丹大学的博士论文答辩。答辩委员会除了主席由该大学的教授担任外，首要成员多来自国外。其余，成员中有正教授职称的必需穿近似博士袍的服装，答辩前先商定每人要提问的题目问题，日常两个。主席还专程提醒，提问时要起立，并以“尊敬的候选人”开首。答辩最先时，由一位拿仪仗的女性司仪领头，接着是答辩委员会主席及其他成员，大家鱼贯而入。此时已守候在答辩会议室的全数人都起立，直到答辩委员会成员在指定的位置上入座。司仪站在中央，公布揭橥答辩最先。答辩约一个半小时后，司仪打铃公布揭橥答辩结束。之后，又在司仪率领下，答辩委员会成员又鱼贯而出。
末尾说一下英国的博士论文评审和论文答辩（viva），日常由本校和外校两位评审人（兼答辩委员会成员）组成。答辩时有的学校还设有一个自力的主席。评审申报分自力申报和团结申报两部门，自力申报由评审人在答辩前各行其是，团结申报在答辩后由两位评审人一路完成。如伯明翰大学在答辩时有一位主席在场，但答辩过程中不能说任何话，除非泛起争执。约克大学则要对答辩全过程进行录音。我所在的萨里大学策画机系，曾设立过主席，但此刻已去除。但若是博士候选人晓畅要求，导师可以在场。但答辩过程中不能措辞，除非受到礼聘。答辩时两位评审人可以对博士论文中的任何细节进行提问，日常会持续三小时摆布。
总之，欧洲大学的博士论文评审和答辩既是对论文质量的把关，也显示了公暖和彼此尊敬的精神。
